The quality of offense is not strain’d. It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven. Upon the lunatic fringe.
October 20th, 2011Last year I got dragged into an overlong debate on Twitter after linking to a blog. It was a highly articulate and reasoned account by the mother of a child with trisomy 21, of how she’d become upset while in the front row of a Frankie Boyle gig when he’d resorted to the traditional stereotypes assigned to people with Downs Syndrome. He’d clearly noticed she was upset and started talking to her. What he should have said then was: “You know what, you’re absolutely right. But the fact these other 2,999 morons laughed means that here, now, I was doing my job.’ He didn’t say that, and instead his response left her feeling humiliated.
The weird thing was that in all the responses I got and the debates that followed, people didn’t mention ‘upset’ or ‘humiliation’, but insisted on the comedian’s ‘Right To Offend’. I didn’t see anything offensive in Boyle’s comments. Thoughtless and unfair, but not offensive.
Even if the ‘offense’ card could stick though, the fact was that Boyle wasn’t making any great satirical point. He wasn’t trying to make his audience think. If there’s anything offensive to me about Boyle then it’s that a man who can appear so intelligent and sharp when guesting, unscripted on You Have Been Watching, is so heavily reliant on the lazy stereotype and tired cliché of a 70s stand-up for his normal day-job schtick.
BBC4’s Holy Flying Circus last night reflected how the like of Python, Thomas & Lee and Parker & Stone have suffered at the media’s insistence that balance is best represented by inflating the offense taken by the lunatic fringe. Any ‘right’ to offend was hard-won at their hands. In the light of that effort (and heritage), offense without a point is an abuse of the comedian’s privileges. Abuse it too often and you end up with Rowan Atkinson fighting to preserve it in a court of law. That, and whatever it is that Top Gear’s become.
The constant invocation of ‘rights!’ also means that, any point that *is* being made or discussion to be had is drowned out by the dead-eyed howl in defence of the straw sacred cow. Twitter’s current hullabuloo sees Ricky Gervais expanding on his argument from ‘Science’ that the term ‘Mong’ is no longer associated with Downs Syndrome, with intelligent replies from the likes of Richard Herring. It’s an issue for which there’s no right or wrong answer. It touches on censorship and the changing use of language but, like raising the Titanic, it’s still too soon for some to contemplate.
Given the highly personal nature of the issue to people like Nicola Clark, I’m guessing Gervais himself is pretty offended by the self-appointed defenders of comedy simply slinging sub-Chaucerian abuse at her, having dismissed her argument as some kind of affront to free speech.
Most depressingly of all, it suggests that the defenders themselves are now becoming the lunatic fringe.




